Facebook Pixel

Logic, Argumentation and Interpretation / Lógica, Argumentación e Interpretación

Proceedings of the 22nd World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Granada 2005. Vol. 5
ISBN:
978-3-515-08914-2
Verlag:
Franz Steiner Verlag
Land des Verlags:
Deutschland
Erscheinungsdatum:
08.06.2007
Herausgeber:
Reihe:
Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (ARSP). Beihefte, Neue Folge
Format:
Softcover
Seitenanzahl:
206
Ladenpreis
48,40 EUR (inkl. MwSt. zzgl. Versand)
Lieferung in 3-4 Werktagen Versandkostenfrei ab 40 Euro in Österreich
Hinweis: Da dieses Werk nicht aus Österreich stammt, ist es wahrscheinlich, dass es nicht die österreichische Rechtslage enthält. Bitte berücksichtigen Sie dies bei ihrem Kauf.
The volume is divided into five sections. In the first chapter entitled „Theory of argumentation“, contributors debate the idea of a rational modification of beliefs as the basis of rational consensus, the Günther-Alexy debate, Opocher’s conception of justice which is taken from a descriptive level to an argumentative one, truth in the field of rhetoric and judicial argumentation as well as sincerity as a necessary condition for effectiveness in legal argumentation. Further sections deal with “Analysis and representation of arguments”, “Contextualized judicial arguments”, “Norms and interpretations” and finally a section on “Logic” with contributions on the stit theory and logic problems in the formalization and representation of legal knowledge in constructing an expert system. Contents I. Theory of Argumentation / Teoría de la argumentación: José Manuel Cabra Apalategui: Discurso, racionalidad y persuasión Peng-Hsiang Wang: Coherence and Revision. Critical Remarks on Günther-Alexy Debate Maurizio Manzin: Justice, Argumentation and Truth in Legal Reasoning. In Memory of Enrico Opocher (1914–2004) Federico Puppo: The Problem of Truth in Judicial Argumentation C.E. Smith: Sincerity in Legal Argumentation Theory II. Analysis and Representation of Argumentation /Análisis y representación de argumentos: Eveline T. Feteris: The Rational Reconstruction of Teleological-Evaluative Arguments Harm Kloosterhuis: Ad Absurdum Arguments in Legal Decisions Günther Kreuzbauer: Visualization of Legal Argumentation III. Contextualized Judicial Argumentation /Argumentación judicial contextualizada: Marko Novak: Limiting Courts: Towards Greater Consistency of Adjudication in the Civil Law System Sonia Esperanza Rodríguez Boente: Los principios generales del Derecho en la argumentación jurídica Thomas da Rosa de Bustamante / Denis Franco Silva: Prospective Overruling: Why and How it Should be Applied (The example of the Brazilian Legal Systen) Stanislovas Tomas: Theory of Judicial Shamanism Derk Venema: Formalism and Non-formalism in Occupied Holland and Belgium 1940–1945 IV. Norms and Interpretation / Normas e interpretación: Jaap Hage: Why Norms are not Imperatives Raymundo Gama Leyva: Some ideas about the nature of presumption rules Josep Aguiló-Regla: On presumptions and Legal Argumentation Marijan Pavcnik: Constitutional Interpretation V. Logic / Lógica Mateusz Klinowski: Theory of Action on a Tree José Pedro Úbeda Rives: Problemas que el Derecho plantea a la lógica