Precedent in the United States Supreme Court
ISBN:
9789400779501
Auflage:
2013
Verlag:
Springer Netherland
Land des Verlags:
Deutschland
Erscheinungsdatum:
21.02.2014
Herausgeber:
Reihe:
Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
Format:
Hardcover
Seitenanzahl:
231
Lieferung in 5-10 Werktagen
Versandkostenfrei ab 40 Euro in Österreich
This volume presents a variety of both normative and descriptive perspectives on the use of precedent by the United States Supreme Court. It brings together a diverse group of American legal scholars, some of whom have been influenced by the Segal/Spaeth "attitudinal" model and some of whom have not. The group of contributors includes legal theorists and empiricists, constitutional lawyers and legal generalists, leading authorities and up-and-coming scholars. The book addresses questions such as how the Court establishes durable precedent, how the Court decides to overrule precedent, the effects of precedent on case selection, the scope of constitutional precedent, the influence of concurrences and dissents, and the normative foundations of constitutional precedent. Most of these questions have been addressed by the Court itself only obliquely, if at all. The volume will be valuable to readers both in the United States and abroad, particularly in light of ongoing debates over the role of precedent in civil-law nations and emerging legal systems.
Schlagwörter
United States Supreme Court
Judicial Precedent in the USA
onstitutional Precedent and The Adjudicative Process
Scope of Constitutional Precedent
Private Rights Litigation
Precedent on the United States Supreme Court
Overruling Constitutional Precedents
Normative Foundations Of Constitutional Precedent
Methodological Stare Decisis
Group Formation and Precedent
Epistemic Defense of Precedent
Due Process Clause of the Constitution
Due Process Clause in the US Constitution
Dialectic of Stare Decisis Doctrine
Decisis and the Selection Effect
Constitutional Stare Decisis as Dispute Resolution
Barriers to Group Formation on the Supreme Court









